Evaluation

Performance Evaluation Model

A structured evaluation model designed to assess real-world achievement, leadership capability, and measurable impact across industries.

Impact & Results

Measured success, growth, influence, and tangible outcomes achieved within the nomination period.

Innovation & Originality

Creativity, problem-solving approaches, and forward-thinking contributions that push boundaries.

Leadership & Vision

Demonstrated ability to lead, inspire, and shape industries or communities toward meaningful change.

Execution & Strategy

Effectiveness in implementing ideas, delivering results, and sustaining performance over time.

Industry Contribution

Contribution to industry standards, community development, or global impact beyond individual gain.

Important Note

Evaluation criteria are adapted per category to ensure fairness and relevance across all industries and sectors.

Scoring Framework

Scoring Methodology

Each nomination is reviewed using a structured 100-point evaluation scale. This scoring model allows jury members to assess nominees consistently while considering the specific nature of each category, industry, and professional achievement.

100-Point Evaluation Scale

Evaluation CriterionMaximum Score
Impact & Results20 points
Innovation & Originality20 points
Leadership & Vision20 points
Execution & Strategy20 points
Industry Contribution20 points
Total Possible Score100 points

Score Interpretation

Score Range
90–100Exceptional achievement and strongest winner-level profile
85–89Outstanding professional achievement
75–84Strong award-level achievement and eligible for recognition
70–74Competitive nominee, subject to additional jury discussion
Below 70Does not meet the preferred recognition threshold

Minimum Recognition Threshold

To maintain the integrity and credibility of the Formula of Success Award, nominees are expected to achieve a minimum evaluation score of 75 out of 100 points to be considered for winner-level recognition. Candidates scoring between 70 and 74 points may remain under jury review but are generally subject to additional discussion, comparative assessment, and category-level consideration.

Final Score

Final results may be based on the average of individual jury scores, category relevance, supporting evidence, comparative benchmarking, and overall alignment with the Formula of Success Award standards.